Background image

terug

Fin de siècle

Fin de siècle fears

11     That history is apt to repeat itself is a powerful superstition. Without a horizon to fix
2 upon, eyes and minds turn to the past for guidance. This seems to be the condition of our
3 fin de siècle. The twentieth century draws towards its close with no great project in hand;
4 history is not at an end but historicism, hopefully, is; with messianic communism a lost
5 cause, no destination for mankind is in sight.
26     The idea of progress was a casualty of the last fin de siècle. The crisis in belief that
7 accompanied the turn of our own century meant that, as Eric Hobsbawm has written, 'The
8 only ideology of serious calibre which remained firmly committed to the nineteenth-
9 century belief in science, reason and progress was Marxism, which was unaffected by
10 disillusion about the present because it looked forward to the future triumph of precisely
11 those "masses" whose rise created so much uneasiness among middle-class thinkers.'
312     The fin de siècle state of mind is characterised by a sense of decadence, lost values
13 and threatened or shattered hopes, which by creating an ideological vacuum make fertile
14 ground for irrationalism. That is plainly the condition of the former Communist world in
15 its moral ruin - but also, though to a lesser extent, the state of mind gaining hold in the
16 United States and Western Europe.
417     In this atmosphere the past can easily masquerade as the future. The fear of a
18 resurgence of virulent nationalism is an example. The disintegration of the Communist and
19 old Russian empires is seen as an event comparable to the collapse of the Austro-
20 Hungarian empire in 1918. Comparable it may be, but that does not mean it will have the
21 same results. Nor is it instructive to equate the Europe reborn in 1989 with the Europe
22 created by the Treaty of Versailles, thereby suggesting that the history of the inter-war
23 years will in some way repeat itself.
524     Some resurgence of suppressed ethnic nationalism undoubtedly there is, but what
25 was the tide of history in the nineteenth and first part of the twentieth century today flows
26 against the tide. Rather, the trend is towards large states accommodating regional and
27 ethnic diversity. The released ethnic tensions in Eastern Europe, for the most part, do not
28 take the form of territorial disputes as they did after Versailles. Hitler and Stalin between
29 them did a ruthless tidying-up job. Almost everywhere, ethnic minorities are much smaller
30 than they were. Yugoslavia is the exception, not the rule; a reminder of what Europe was
31 and not a prototype for the future.
632     The centripetal forces of economie interdependence are generally stronger than the
33 centrifugal forces of ethnic self-deterrnination. The rediscovery of cultural identity
34 competes with the spread of universal culture through media and information
35 technologies. These played a powerful part in undermining authoritarian regimes and will
36 continue to work towards open societies with market-based economies. The revolutions of
37 1989 were at the same time nationalist and anti-Communist; a purpose of independence
38 was the freedom to seek admission to the Western system of interdependence.
739     The same may apply, hopefully, to those components of the former Soviet Union
40 that can reasonably aspire to eventual integration with Europe, notably Ukraine. Russia
41 itself may be a rather different case: a far-flung multi-ethnic empire in itself, whose only
42 history to repeat is one of autocracy inimical to individual enterprise. On that we had
43 better reserve judgement.
844     In the case of the United States it seems as unlikely as with Europe that the dismal
45 history of the inter-war period will prove a guide to the future. Isolationism and
46 protectionism were among the responses to the First World War and the great depression
47 that ensued, and today those instincts are evident again. But the US is no longer a self-
48 sufficient continental economy: it trades 30 per cent of its agriculture and 20 per cent of its
49 manufactures overseas. Nor is it any longer the New World haven, disentangled from
50 European conflicts; it is a much vaster multi-ethnic and multi-lingual society which
51 continues to absorb massive migrations from all around the world.
952     It may be an aspect of the fin de siècle condition to discover that in our ideological
53 vacuum there is no refuge to be found in the past - and not much danger, therefore, of
54 history repeating itself in the manners feared. Rather, we have to map new futures as we
55 go, without the aid of transcendental visions. In the process, perhaps, we may free
56 ourselves from the delusion that human progress is to be measured by centennials
57  preceded by onslaughts of fin de siècle despondency.
 
     Peter Jenkins in 'The Independent', February 18, 1992