Background image

terug

Britains democracy

Britains democracy

 We are a non-ideological community; the British deal in situations, in actual problems and not in
 ideas. But perhaps this tendency is now being carried to a length which leads to public confusion,
 which prevents coherent action and is one reason why this nation is not reaching its full potential.
 Consider, for instance, the notion of parliamentary democracy. Britain used to pride itself on
5 being the oldest and most consistent example of representative government. The people chose their
 representatives and they, in turn, selected a Prime Minister. He was responsible to the House of
 Commons whose members answered for their actions at the next general election.
 Then elements of direct democracy began to creep in. The rival candidates for the post of Prime
 Minister appealed directly to the people. The parties put forward elaborate programmes, and it
10 was argued that MPs elected on a party ticket were bound to support that party's leader and
 programme no matter how situations might have changed or what second thoughts they might have
 had.
 The position was made much more confused by the introduction of referenda, first on
 membership of the EEC, now on Scottish and Welsh devolution *. To have a referendum is a public
15 15 admission that on that issue the House of Commons does not adequately represent the people. it
 also indicates that there are two classes of questions: those of major importance which must be
 settled by the voters and those of minor importance which can be left to Parliament.
 Now a further dimension has been added to this confusion. During the debates on the Scotland
 Bill, several MPs explained that aithough they have always been opposed to devolution and aithough
20 their opposition to it has increased, they would vote in favour of the Bill. But, at the same time,
 they announced that once the Bill is passed they will campaign for a 'No' vote in the subsequent
 referendum.
 When I asked one of them how he defended such conduct, he said that he had stood at the
 general election on a manifesto which included devolution so he was bound to vote for it in
25 Parliament but at the referendum he was a free man and would express his real feelings.
 Another argued that if the Bill was defeated in the House, pressure for devolution would
 continue; so he voted for the Bill in order to have a referendum where the rejection of the Bill (for
 which he would campaign) would be decisive.
 When this sort of thing happens, it is not surprising that citizens lose their confidence in
30 Parliament. Indeed, pressures and problems from all sides confirm that it is time we made up our
 minds what kind of democracy we want so that Parliament can be reformed accordingly.

John P. Mackintosh MP
in the Times, December 5, 1977

*) devolution: the delegation of certain powers to regional governments by a central government