Background image

terug

Tekst: No bugs on board

 

No bugs on board

 
 Contagion: How commerce has spread disease
 by Mark Harrison, Yale University Press, £25/$38
 
 Reviewed by David Cohen
 
1     ANYONE who has travelled through an airport has
 surely noticed the rather long list of items that are
 prohibited on board a plane. But along with the
 more understandably forbidden articles, such as
 guns, knives, grenades and canisters of petrol,
 there is often a list of seemingly innocuous cargo:
 fresh foodstuffs. In Australia, even muddy shoes
 are frowned upon. It may seem a bit excessive, but
 these prohibitions are the climax of a long
 historical trend and are motivated, as Mark Harrison reveals in Contagion,
 by a mixture of public-health, food-safety and protectionist trading
 policies.
2     Harrison's erudite study of the impact of global commerce and travel
 on the spread of disease charts how the responses of governments and
 traders to outbreaks evolved, from the Black Death some 650 years ago,
 to the recent outbreaks of SARS and avian flu. As Australia's muddy-shoe
 ban intimates, disease vectors are a serious concern. Viruses and
 bacteria that travel in soil or food can have a disastrous impact on crops
 and livestock, and the spread of human diseases such as yellow fever and
 malaria can be devastating for public health. A particularly deadly strain of
 malaria was exported from Africa to the rest of the world by the slave
 trade, for example.
3     It was as a consequence of the Black Death that "quarantine" came
 into vogue as the preferred means of disease control. Simultaneously it
 became a potent weapon of economic warfare. Harrison goes to great
 pains to point out that throughout history, governments have needed little
 encouragement to adopt quarantine and import bans as weapons of
 foreign policy and economic advantage, often with tragic consequences
 for the "victim" states where the infections originated.
4     Contagion is a thorough, well-researched and thoughtful tome, and
 Harrison includes some interesting asides about the history of medicine.
 But be warned, his writing style is academic in nature and dry in tone. Not
 as infectious as one might have hoped.
 
 NewScientist, 2012