Background image

terug

Reading on the web is not really reading

Reading on the web is not really reading

1     For anyone looking honestly at the American intellectual landscape today, it is
 impossible to escape the fear that something has gone badly wrong with
 ‘diffusion of knowledge throughout the community’ – even though, ironically,
 the internet offers the most powerful tool ever invented for the spread of
 education. And everything that has gone wrong has gone particularly wrong
 among the young.
2     The standard political approach from both Democrats and Republicans has
 been to blame undeniable educational deficiencies on bad schools and bad
 teachers. The ‘No Child Left Behind Act’, a centrepiece of President George W.
 Bush’s domestic agenda, mandates standardised tests and evaluates teachers and
 schools based on the test scores. But the chief effect seems to have been to force
 teachers to devote disproportionate time to stuffing students with soon-to-beforgotten
 facts for the state-approved quizzes. The same teenagers falter when
 confronted with an international examination designed, as the Organisation for
 Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test is, to assess their ability
 to apply scientific facts to real-life problems.
3     Among Americans aged 18 to 24, four out of ten never read any books –
 fiction or non-fiction – unless required for work or school. As for news, the
 majority of people under 30 are not paying attention at all. According to a study
 conducted by the journal Television Quarterly, only one in 12 adults under 30
 reads a daily newspaper. Television newscasts are watched by one in six. Those
 figures are no surprise, but the study also [id:71962] that the young have simply
 shifted their news-gathering to the web. In fact, only one out of eight Americans
 under 30 regularly reads news on the internet. Approximately half of men from
 18 to 34, by contrast, spend nearly three hours a day playing video games.
4     It is hardly surprising that in 2006, three years into Iraq war, nearly two
 thirds of adults aged between 18 and 24 were unable to find Iraq on a map
 marked with the names of countries – meaning that they did not have the
 slightest idea of where in the world to look. [id:71968] was another finding from the
 same poll, conducted by National Geographic-Roper. Nearly half of young
 Americans do not think it necessary to know the location of other countries in
 which important news is being made. It is ignorant not to know where your
 country is fighting a war, but it is arrogant and anti-rational to insist that such
 ignorance does not matter.
5     One of the more heated debates in the US today is whether ‘reading’ on the
 internet bears any resemblance to reading in the traditional sense. A horde of
 technophile writers and scholars (most of whom owe their living to the ‘new
 media’) predictably promotes the notion that worries about the decline of
 reading are confined to fuddy-duddy Luddites1). A recent article in the New York
 Times (coyly headlined, ‘Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading?’) quoted
 Donna E. Alverman, a professor of language and literacy education at the
 University of Georgia, who said that young people ‘are using sound and images
 so that they have a world of ideas to put together that aren’t necessarily language
 oriented’. What codswallop!
6     A more revealing comment in the same article came from a high-school
 student, Hunter Gaudet, who observed that he never read books unless forced to
 do so and said that ‘they go through a lot of details that aren’t really needed’. He
 added, ‘Online just gives you what you need, nothing more or less.’
7     American foundations and businesses are now spending huge amounts of
 money to develop more ‘educational’ video games, so that schools will not have
 to depend on pesky books with ‘details’ that aren’t really needed. The Federation
 of American Scientists, an organisation best known for advising the government
 on national security issues, issued a widely publicised report titled ‘Harnessing
 the Power of Video Games for Learning’. The document was released in
 conjunction with the Entertainment Software Corporation, a public relations
 group promoting video games that has cornered roughly 90 per cent of the $7
 billion gaming market worldwide.
8     Of course, the empire of infotainment knows no national boundaries, and
 neither do the knowledge deficits promoted by the decline of reading. There are
 several reasons why the dumbing down of American culture ought to worry
 people in parts of the world that are still behind the US on the ignorance curve.
 First and most obvious, there is the elephant-in-the-room factor. If the US turns
 to video games to address classroom problems created, in significant measure,
 by children’s addiction to video, only a nanosecond will pass before education
 establishment Pooh Bahs2), in the UK and elsewhere, start pushing schoolsponsored
 video games, in the absence of any evidence of their utility, as a way
 to improve student performance.
9     A more subtle factor is the impossibility of conducting informed discourse,
 nationally or internationally, when most of the public has lost its ability to follow
 a narrative. In our culture of distraction, more and more people cannot
 remember what they knew only a year ago – much less what happened five years
 ago.
10     This intellectual crisis – it is not too strong a word – clearly transcends
 politics. Ralph Waldo Emerson, in a visionary 1837 speech at Harvard known as
 the ‘American Scholar’ oration, declared that ‘the mind of this country, taught to
 aim at low objects, eats upon itself’. This line resonates even more strongly
 today, when the low objects are purveyed along an infotainment highway that
 fragments memory and encourages confusion between information and the
 genuine framework of knowledge essential to turning isolated facts (and errors)
 into a reasoned civic dialogue.
 
 Susan Jacoby in The Spectator, 2008


noot 1    Luddites: people who oppose technical or technological change.
noot 2    Pooh Bahs: persons in high position or of great influence.<