Background image

terug

Vraag 27

1    There are two reliable ways    extraordinary prices – is nothing
 of telling if you have won more than a tax on gullibility.
 an argument. The first is if7    Such gullibility can have
 your disputants switch dangerous effects on your health (as
 from discussion of the well as your bank balance). A few
 facts to accusations about motives; years ago my wife decided we should
 the second, more obviously, is if they have an entirely organic vegetable
 descend to mere abuse. garden. To this end she refused all
2    Alan Dangour, a nutritionist at man-made fertilisers and ordered a
 the London School of Hygiene and truckload of pigeon droppings. What
 Tropical Medicine, should therefore could be more natural? Neither was
 feel he has had an encouragingly there anything unnatural in the
 uncomfortable week. He is the author germs I inhaled through the spores of
 of a meta-study in the American our organic manure, thereby
 Journal of Clinical Nutrition that contracting psittacosis. This
 concluded, from 50 years of scientific developed into “atypical” pneumonia,
 evidence, that so-called “organic” which was of course resistant to all
 food was no healthier than standard antibiotics.
 conventionally farmed products. He8    [id:83553]. If chemicals and
 revealed that he had received “hate pesticides in foods are as dangerous
 mail” and was “taken aback” by the for humans as the Soil Association
 “abusive” language used. claims, we should expect
3    Ben Goldacre, an NHS doctor and conventional farmers, who handle the
 author of the acclaimed book Bad stuff in industrial quantities, to be
 Science, has had a similar week. In dropping dead before the rest of us
 his newspaper column he had taken with all sorts of chemical-induced
 apart the Soil Association’s criticisms cancers.
 of Dangour’s paper - which was9    The most exhaustive analysis of
 funded by Britain’s Food Standards this matter was published in 2004, in
 Agency - notably his claim that the a paper by Professor Anthony
 health benefits of organic food “could Trewavas of Edinburgh University.
 not be measured by the evidence His paper revealed that “of 12
 identified in the FSA paper”. separate investigations on farmers
4    When I called him, he remarked: involving in total about 300,000
 “In my experience the [comments of people, 11 found that farmers had
 the] organic food, anti-vaccine and overall cancer rates very substantially
 homeopathy movements are lower than the general public”.
 unusually hateful and generally10    Trewavas concludes that “the
 revolve around bizarre allegations reasons why farming is so healthy are
 that you covertly represent some not known, but these data indicate
 financial or corporate interest. I do not only a null result for the
 not; but I do think it reveals hypothesis relating pesticide
  exposure to cancer, but a consistent
  result for the alternative, that
  pesticide exposure may protect
  against cancer”. I realise that
  publicising Professor Trewavas’s
  paper might itself cause medical
  problems, as Soil Association
  executives choke with rage. But I
  think this a risk offset by the [id:xxx]
  the public as a whole.
 11    The provocative professor also
 something about their own motives points out that in the period since
 that they can only conceive of a 1950 - as pesticides and industrial
 person holding a position as a result farming took an increasing role in
 of financial self-interest.” food production - “stomach cancer
5    His linking of the organic rates have declined by 60% in
 movement with homeopathy is western countries”. This is generally
 telling. They are cults masquerading ascribed to the fact that fruit and
 as science. The organic movement, vegetable consumption has doubled
 philosophically, is based on an in that period - but why did this
 inchoate faith in nature, seeing any change in diet occur? Because
 human interference with nature as in modern agriculture, aided by air
 some way bad and destructive of the freight, has been able to get such
 roots” of creation. products to consumers at evercheaper
6    No one should have been in the prices all year round.
 least surprised by Dangour’s results.12    This just demonstrates the
 The more rational among the organic common-sense point that diet, rather
 movement long ago stopped claiming than whether food is produced
 as scientific fact that their products “organically” or not, is the key to
 are better for humans. The Canadian healthy eating. A high-fat diet is as
 Organic Growers, reacting less bad for you when the food has an
 hysterically than the Soil Association, “organic” sticker on it as when it
 responded to Dangour’s survey by doesn’t.
 saying that it “didn’t make health13    The general public, however, has
 claims based on the nutrition of already begun to call the organic
 organic food”. This is the bluff, perhaps one reason Whole
 scientifically responsible attitude; but Foods’ sales have suffered over three
 it is also a deadly blow to the consecutive quarters in the United
 marketing of organic foods, which States and Prince Charles’s Duchy
 depends on yummy mummies Originals has seen its profits slump.
 continuing to believe that if Cecilia That noise you heard last week was
 and Frederick are fed only organic the organic balloon bursting.
 foods, then the little darlings will 
 grow up healthier and stronger. It is Dominic Lawson in The Sunday
 in this sense that the organic Times, 2009
 business – ordinary food at

terug

Bijlage(n)

Bij deze vraag worden één of meerdere bijlagen gebruikt.

Bijlage: Organic food is just a tax on the gullible Engels