Background image

terug

Death and the American

Death and the American

1     “And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt   655     America is still one of the most violent industrial-
 give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for ised democracies in the world, despite putting more
 tooth.” The Old Testament words embarrass many people into prison than its counterparts and despite
 late 20th-century Europeans; theirs is a Christianity more than 4,000 executions since 1930 (another 3,200
5 modelled on the forgiving culture of the New Test- or so Americans are on what is chillingly called
 ament, with its gentle advice to “love thy neighbour60 “death row”). Clearly, a system of justice including
 as thyself.” Americans are unembarrassed. More the death penalty has had little deterrent effect.
 than any other western country, the United States7     Yet few see that as an argument to change the sys-
 takes religion both seriously and fundamentally. Is tem. What matters is not even prevention, although
10 that why it still persists in putting its murderers to New York’s “zero tolerance” policing has helped to
 death?65 cut its murder rate in half, to 80-odd victims a month.
2     Maybe not. After all, if the polls are right, most Instead, what counts is retribution. Retribution is
 people in most countries support capital punish- about having to account for one’s actions, and so
 ment. The difference in America is that its politi- about the fairness that informs the American view of
15 cians, forever running for re-election, do too. Bill how a society should be run.
 Clinton, the Oxford and Yale student, was a con- 
 vinced opponent of the death penalty; two decades 
 later the same Bill Clinton, as governor of Arkansas 
 and a presidential candidate, authorised the execu- 
20 tion of Ricky Ray Rector, a brain-damaged black 
 convict. In his second term, Mr Clinton is no longer 
 running for office, but why waste political capital by 
 advocating mercy for any murderer, let alone 
 Timothy McVeigh, just sentenced to death for the 
25 bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building? 
3     Why indeed? To do so would be to create con- 
 troversy where there is none. True, the Washington 
 Post last weekend editorialised against the McVeigh870     If you work hard, you can and will succeed. This is
 sentence (the state “should not have the authority the dogma underpinning the American dream. It ener-
30 to act as a killer has acted and take a life for a life gises the immigrant and it helps to explain why the
 taken”), but a standpoint of that sort is rare. For underclass riots only rarely, despite the country’s enor-
 many, a more convincing reason to oppose the mous inequali- ties of wealth and opportunity. On the
 death penalty is its seeming racial bias: blacks make75 other hand, if you are lazy, you will fail; and above
 up some 13% of America’s population, but account all, if you do wrong, you will be punished. Or at least
35 both for half of its prisoners and half of those who you should be.
 are executed. The Reverend Jesse Jackson calls this9     In other countries, legal flaws and inequities – esp-
 “legal lynching” – a view which, incidentally, also ecially the possibility that a man may be executed for
 leads him to oppose the sentence on Mr McVeigh.80 a crime he did not commit – are enough to doom the
4     Yet most Americans have little time for the critical death penalty. Not in America. Instead, death is modi-
40 remarks of the Post or the arguments of Mr Jackson. fied by ludicrously lengthy appeals (the average stay
 In a Harris poll carried out immediately after Mr of execution for state-imposed sentences is now al-
 McVeigh’s conviction, 75% said they believed in most nine years) which put off the day of accounting,
 capital punishment. The support was across all85 but do not remove it altogether.
 parties and all regions, if not quite all races (black10     Arguably, the present passion for executing
45 support for the ultimate penalty ran at 46%). The murderers is a passing phase: America has dropped
 McVeigh trial seems to have changed no one’s mind. it in the past, and some dozen states and the District
 Gallup reckons that support for capital punishment of Columbia do not have a death penalty. But Mr
 rose from 42% in 1966 to 79% last year.90 Jackson and the Washington Post should not bet on
5     Now add some history to the statistical mix. From the fashion changing fast. They may do better to
50 the mid-1930s to the early 1960s, the rate of serious remind a nation of believers that everyone, saint or
 crime in the United States barely changed from year sinner, must face the judgment of the Lord – so why
 to year. Then came the 1960s, a decade not just of anticipate it?
 flower-power and free love but of social upheaval in 
 which serious crimes soared.95    ‘The Economist’, June 21, 1997