Background image

terug

Keeping libaries alive

Keeping libraries alive


1 Some 200 years ago, when Thomas Jefferson built an 'academical village' in the
2 rolling greenery of his native Virginia, he put a white-porticoed temple at its centre and
3 filled it with books.The library's prominence proclaimed his revolutionary faith in learning
4 and truth. In today's University of Virginia, a new revolution can be glimpsed.A modem
5 and password let both staff and students study thousands of volumes of literary, historical
6 and philosophical works as well as reference texts, bibliographies and even the manuscript
7 papers of Jefferson himself. The texts are in a state-of-the-art database system; the readers
8 Bare wherever they want to be.
9 The explosion of available electronic text may be the greatest change in learning
10 since collections of books displaced oral traditions of storytelling. As such, it might seem to
11 spell the end of the library. A world's worth of huge, digitized, downloadable, searchable
12 databases will eventually be available anywhere you can get a dialing tone. All the
13 contents of all the libraries, say some visionaries, will be everywhere. And the library itself
14 will be nowhere.
15 As visions go, this is short-sighted. Just as there are storytellers in an age of reading,
16 there will be libraries in the electronic world. Old traditions will live on, old paper will be
17 stored until it rots. The thoughtful and the quirky will still want to convene in reading
18 rooms. But libraries should not just be pleasant relics. They should have an active role as
19 places to get information - particularly for those unable to afford computers, modems and
20 the rest. There are several ways of trying to prevent the electronic age from widening the
21 gap between the haves and the have-nots. Public libraries offer one of the better ones.
22 After all, forcing information providers to make their wares freely available to
23 everyone would give them no incentive to put anything at all on to the network. The cables
24 that bring pay-per-view films into the house will bring pay-per-view learning, too. And
25 some people will not be able to afford to pay. For these people, a public library system
26 should remain a basic resource for learning. It cannot provide access to everything; but it
27 can provide access to a lot.
28 The paradoxical point about this computerized world is that if access is not to be
29 rationed by price, then another bottleneck is required: the need to go somewhere. People
30 who want information badly enough to go out of their way for it should be able to get
31 more free material than those willing only to click a switch at home. The journey is, in
32 effect, a simple and workable means test - as it has always been. Copyright holders have
33 been willing to have their books available in public libraries, provided that nobody can
34 copy them in their entirety.Walking to a library and being ready to wait to use a library
35 book were, they thought, so inconvenient th at those who could afford to, would still buy
36 their wares. So it should be with information on line.
37 It will not be possible to let people consult every part of the information network for
38 free. Libraries will have limited money to spend on electronic data,just as they have little
39 money to spend on books. But by clubbing together to get good rates for unlimited access
40 to a body of basic information, public libraries could provide a collection available to all
41 without fee. It would be no meagre thing - probably, in time, far bigger than the current
42 contents of most libraries. And it would be more than just a safety net for the have-nots. It
43 would be a meeting place in cyberspace, available to anyone prepared to go to a library. It
44 would be the sort of useful democratic monument that the Jeffersonian spirit demands despite
45 its lack of graceful porticos.

'The Economist', August 27, 1994