Background image

terug

Beware the environmentalists who glorify nature

Beware the environmentalists who glorify nature

11     After years of pushing fruitlessly against a locked door, the door has suddenly burst
2 open and we're all falling over ourselves into the bright new age of ecology. And how
3 bright it is. We have stumbled upon a new set of ideas which connect the most
4 commonplace aspects of our daily lives with the rest of the creation and the very future
5 of the planet. Green has all the makings of the new religion. But already myths are
6 creeping into the Green faith. Dangerous and powerful myths, fundamentalist myths
7 which could undermine the rational foundations of environmental thinking.
28     Heathcote Williams's latest poetic TV production, 'Sacred Elephant' - featured on
9 BBC2's Animal Night - represents the militant wing of the new Green theology. Williams
10 specialises in the poetry of Angry Veneration: anger at the human destruction of God's
11 Sacred Creatures. I was moved by his requiem for the whale, and then the dolphin, and
12 now the elephant, but I can’t help feeling that these poems show worrying signs of
13 irrational fanaticism. Well-meaning as they are, they produce a deeply mistaken and
14 romanticised view of nature and our place in the scheme of things.
315     For Williams, it is not good enough simply to respect animals. Elephants are more
16 than just our equals in creation: they are our superiors. 'With its ears it can discern a
17 mouse/ Which is reassuring for mice': the suggestion is that elephants are nice to mice.
18 And always the assumption is that only we sadistic humans indulge in the rape and cruel
19 destruction of our environment. But this is simply not true. A few nights spent in a South
20 American rainforest or on the plains of Africa should dispel any lingering notions that
21 wild animals are nice to each other. We humans may have the sheer power and numbers
22 to inflict great damage, but we are not by nature more destructive than the other animals.
423     'The Nandi and the Masai1) know the elephant/ As a survivor from an older order/
24 And respect its seniority': yet another myth - that only 'noble savages' still possess
25 knowledge of the paradise world of harmonious nature, knowledge which we have long
26 lost. Not so; the 'noble savage' is a myth now, and probably always was. Evidence from
27 Easter Island, for instance, has revealed that the famous stone-carving culture vanished
28 very soon after the last forests were cleared. It seems the Easter Islanders deforested
29 themselves out of existence ... 500 years ago. Contact with aboriginal people today in,
30 say, Amazonia reveals much the same thing: they have an unsentimental and utilitarian -
31 not to say short-sighted - approach to the forest.
532     Now I'm not saying that animals are any nastier than we humans. I’m certainly not
33 saying that aboriginal peoples are - or were - any less ecologically 'sound' than we are.
34 What I am saying is that there's not really a lot to pick and choose between us, and that
35 Heathcote Williams's obsession with self-denigration is mistaken and unhelpful. If we
36 lowly humans are to rise to the mammoth - sorry, immense - task of assuming
37 responsible stewards hip of the planet then we must have great self-confidence and an
38 intimate understanding of biology.
639     My perception of our role in the environment is almost the opposite of Williams’s:
40 we humans are on the threshold of becoming the first creatures to control our biological
41 imperatives in a rational, constructive way. In biological terms we are immensely
42 successful, and yet we are about to become the first species in the earth's history to
43 voluntarily limit our success in the name of harmony. OK, so we may have left it pretty
44 late, but at least we are beginning to act. I'd like to see a herd of elephants negotiate a
45 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.
746     Five years ago, the environment needed all the friends it could muster: every inch
47 of newspaper, every film story was another nut or bolt in the huge tower of awareness
48 which was to be built. Perhaps as a result we let our sense of discrimination run wild. It
49 is a common enough fault among fanatics, especially when they are in a minority. But
50 we've got to exercise those old muscles again if we are to keep the core of environmental
51 thinking sound. Fundamentalists - whatever their faith - are both dangerous and a
52 laughing stock.
 
     Brian Leith in 'The Listener', January 18, 1990


noot 1: The Nandi and the Masai: two native African peoples