Background image

terug

Toxie futures

Toxie futures

11     The leak of toxic gases at Bhopal, India, in 1984was one of the worst man-made
2 disasters the world has yet experienced. Estimates of those who have died vary from
3 4,300 to nearly 20,000, and five years later more than one gas victim still dies every day.
4 The disaster caused not only death, but disability and diseases. The gases are reported to
5 have genetic after-effects, and a new generation of gas victims is now being born.
26     In all perhaps 445,000 poor people have been affected. For five years they have
7 been left to suffer, starve and die. The strategy of Union Carbide, the American
8 multinational company responsible, has been to minimise the damage to itself and the
9 chemical industry worldwide and to reduce the compensation paid to the barest
10 minimum. The then Indian government finally agreed to a shameful compromise which
11 was worth just £115 for any permanently disabled victim.
312     The Western press has been quite indifferent, writing off the death toll as the cost
13 of increased food production and economic development from which the Third World
14 benefits. This is of course a myth that the Third World, which controls less than 5 per
15 cent of the world's media output, has not been in a strong position to prove false.
416     One of the scarcely noted decisions the new J.P. Singh government in India has
17 taken, has been to re-open the whole Bhopal case and to promise relief to the victims.
18 This has outraged Union Carbide, which talks patronisingly about the rule of law. Vet
19 the Indian government's original compromise, taken over the heads of the victims and
20 extinguishing all further civil and criminal proceedings, made a mockery of the law. In a
21 real sense, Singh's government is revaluing the rule of law in India.
522     The Bhopal disaster is not simply a tragic example of Western exploitation of the
23 Third World. It carries a brutal warning for the first world too: disasters may well occur
24 in the metropolitan heartlands of Europe, the US and Japan. Further, the hazards that
25 toxic chemicals create don't stop short at spectacular outrages like Bhopal. It is necessary
26 also to consider not only 'possible Bhopals', but also 'mini-Bhopals' and 'slow-motion
27 Bhopals' - smaller fatal leaks, routine releases of toxic chemicals into air and water, the
28 slow poisoning associated with toxic dumps, the long-term exposure of workers and the
29 general population to low levels of toxic chemicals.
630     At the very least, the Bhopal disaster should have inspired demands for
31 compensation which took a real measure of the worth of human life, involving long-term
32 monitoring and a trust fund to compensate people for unforeseen after-effects: and a
33 major, and of course expensive, regulation of the chemical industry globally.
734     But we have seen in other areas that bureaucratic regulation frequently achieves
35 very little. At the very least, regulation requires the active participation of the workforce
36 and outside community, and a freedom of information which is so far denied in the cause
37 of commercial freedom. The investment in highly toxic chemicals is a major gamble,
38 taken by the few, with the future of us all.
839     It is about time that we questioned the way in which toxic chemicals have become
40 part of our lives and asked how we can free ourselves of their continuing use. But we
41 also need to question the international economy and the power of multinational
42 companies to escape local, national and global control.
 
     from 'New Statesman & Society', January 26, 1990