Background image

terug

China's great gamble

China's great gamble

David Jessel assesses the cultural impact of China's fast developing broadcasting industry.

11     Under the reform policies of the present party leadership, China is humming with
2 individual commercial activity; the stern, collectivist ethic is all but gone. Popular TV
3 dramas like A New Star bring to the screen a candid glimpse of this twist in social values.
4 It is set in the countryside, and chronicles the break-up of the collective farm under an
5 impatient new reformist broom. The old machinery is auctioned off to the highest
6 bidders; fights break out, and the loss of the spirit of collective community is lamented.
7 Extraordinarily, the play does not preach: it leaves the viewer to assess the moral price to
8 be paid in following state policies.
29     Li Hailin, the Shanghai TV station's new editor, dismisses any suggestion that
10 Chinese television could be the world's biggest experiment in mind control: 'No
11 government wants to boast about the docile obedience of its people; it wants to be able
12 to say that its citizens are the most industrious, the bravest and the most intelligent. The
13 function of a government is to manage, not to control.'
314     The criterion controlling news, says Li Hailin, is that 'nothing should be broadcast
15 which goes against socialism and the Communist party'. But China Central Television's
16 deputy Director-General, Mr Chen, admits 'it is impossible that we should think exactly
17 the same as the government all the time ... it could be that the government's ideas are not
18 altogether correct or lopsided. When this happens, we always think it is hard enough to
19 handle a family of ten, let alone a country of a billion people; we feel it is our duty as
20 television workers to help the government run this country well. So when there are
21 problems we tend to solve them by consulting rather than insulting each other on
22 television - because abusing each other can achieve nothing but plunge the country into
23 a chaotic state.'
424     The Chinese television lens produces the sharpest social focus in its advice
25 programmes. Viewers write in to their electronic bosom friend, and an audience of 350
26 million follows the wisdom of Shen Li, television's most popular agony aunt. Her
27 programme deals with the problems caused by some of China's vast experiments in social
28 engineering, like the rule limiting children to only one per family. As a result of this
29 policy, China is in danger of becoming a nation of spoilt brats. Shen Li's programme
30 provides careful parental counselling. Many of her letters are from teenagers, awkward
31 and unsure about how to cope with the demands of fashion, image and style.
532     It's a new social agenda set, in part, by television itself. Entertainment programmes
33 are as slick and showy as most in the West - indeed, the unprecedentedly large number
34 of broken marriages is blamed on television glamour, which, it's said, has left many
35 people dissatisfied with their marital lot. Television advertising, too, inevitably raises
36 expectations, which, left unsatisfied, sour into envious discontent. The TV counter in
37 Shanghai's biggest department store is besieged by customers c1amouring for the biggest
38 and best colour sets.
639     What hope, then, of China's unique cultural identity surviving the coming of telly?
40 Those who believe in the Gresham Law of television, that bad programmes drive out
41 good ones, may not be very optimistic. Broadcasters set out with the intention of giving
42 the public what's good for them, but it's not long before the audience rebels against
43 eating up its crusts, and demands immediate access to the chocolate cake.
744     China's TV bosses admit that, to begin with, they treated their audience as children;
45 'but now these "children" have grown up, and can think for themselves. We must
46 upgrade our standards accordingly. If our audience are, so to speak, university graduates,
47 we in television must be, as it were, university professors of profound and extensive
48 learning. Otherwise,' says Mr Chen, 'we shouldn't be in our jobs.'
 
     from The Listener', October 9, 1986