Background image

terug

Outrageous and untrue

Outrageous and untrue

11     Can an industry with a turnover of £ 35 billion be expected to be objective about
2 its activities? I'm only asking because I've been leafing through a pamphlet issued by the
3 Food & Drink Federation, whose members do have such a turnover. It has a pastoral
4 cover showing cows grazing in a field gazing benignly at a tablecloth laid in the grass, on
5 which perch a representative sample of the British diet - canned peaches and baked
6 beans, a bottle of lemon squash, half a wholemeal loaf, a carton of yogurt, some biscuits
7 and a packet of frozen peas.
28     The pamphlet, Common Sense About Food, is supposed to be a commentary on the
9 current debate about the nation's diet. It is as soothing as a cough mixture, as comforting
10 as a cup of cocoa. A skilful piece of writing designed to tranquillize those who might be
11 alarmed by suggestions that the food they are eating is rubbish.
312     The main theme of the pamphlet is that ordinary folk are capable of deciding for
13 themselves what they are going to eat; they don't want to be 'dictated to by the
14 authorities or by food freaks'. A vision is conjured up of petty Hitlers reintroducing food
15 rationing, and bearded visionaries forcing us all to eat raw carrots and nuts. 'Some
16 critics,' says the federation, 'praise the diet we had during the last war and would like to
17 see the authorities control what people eat ... they seem to forget how deadly dull this
18 wartime diet was.'
419     The federation points to the 50,000 food and drinks products now available to all,
20 and the dozens of new products that are tried out each week, as a proof that
21 'manufacturers are constantly studying what people want'. There is, of course, quite a bit
22 about processed food. Tea, says the pamphlet, is a processed food, and so is butter, milk
23 and bread. So what's wrong with processed food?
524     And what's wrong with additives? They've all been approved by the government as
25 safe. What the pamphlet doesn't suggest is that a large part of the processed food which
26 the industry markets is nowhere near as nutritious as bread and butter and milk, and
27 when it comes to additives the government has a very permissive attitude to what is safe.
628     According to the London Food Commission, of the 3,500 additives in use in the
29 UK only 277 are regulated, and only 149 additives permitted in Britain also have EEC
30 approval. Of the 17 artificial colours permitted by the UK government, five are banned
31 by the rest of the EEC, ten are not permitted in the USA, and Norway has banned all 17.
732     But then, says the federation, these additives are only used 'to produce products
33 with the characteristics that people want. If consumers' attitudes change, the food
34 industry will always adapt accordingly.' But how likely is it that attitudes will change
35 when the pressures to consume foods with high levels of fat and sugar are so intense?
36 The only reference in the pamphlet to sugar is that it's 'a traditional method of preserving
37 used in making jams and in confectionery'. No suggestion that mega-tons of sugar are
38 added needlessly to processed foods to render them more acceptable and toothsome.
839     'Some commentators assert that the food industry puts its profits before the
40 nation's health,' says the federation, adding indignantly, 'this is outrageous and untrue.'
41 But is it? On the back of the pamphlet the federation prints the recommendations of
42 COMA, the government's committee on the medical aspects of food policy. COMA has
43 recommended that we cut down on our total fat intake and eat more bread, cereals, fruit
44 and vegetables. And yet, of the 325 million spent on food advertising in 1985, only about
45 one penny in the pound went on promoting fruit and vegetables.
946     The federation's pamphlet does promise some hope for the future. 'Where there is
47 authoritative advice on diet and health,' it says, 'with well-established scientific backing
48 the food industry will always respond with decisive support.' Perhaps, in view of
49 COMA's recommendations, the federation could persuade its 47 trade association
50 members to rethink their advertising budgets for 1987.
 
     Derek Cooper in 'The Listener', January 1, 1987