Background image

terug

Watch on crime

 Does television have a part to play in helping the police? The Metropolitan Police would seem
 to think so, and many a Cockney must have felt uncomfortable over the years as a direct result
 of a mention on ITV's Police Five. But now police forces from all over Britain are co-operating
 with the BBC in a new, different and larger-seale initiative, Crimewatch UK.
5 Aimed directly at involving the public in combating crime, this monthly program will employ
 a variety of devices. The central feature will be two or three reconstructions of crimes - as
 accurate and detailed as possible - and each of these will be followed by an appeal from an
 officer involved in the investigation. Viewers are invited to phone in, and a team of police
 'answerers' will be on hand to take their calls.
10 Now, one of the questions to ask about Crimewatch is: will it help catch criminals? Each
 programme will be followed by a ten-minute update, in which the presenters will report any
 progress made on the night, and subsequent programmes will follow up earlier stories. But what
 sort of results can be expected? Interestingly, there are pointers: a similar type of program,
 under the title Aktenzeichen XV, was broadcast over five years in West Germany. In that period
15 it resulted in 155 prosecutions. It also attracted large audiences and, according to opinion polls,
 had a 'very positive effect' on viewers. But that, of course, was in another country - and one with
 notably more authoritarian public attitudes.
 However, even in Germany the program came in for criticism, on the grounds that it
 pre-empted the decisions of the courts, hounded minor offenders rather than big-business
20 criminals, neglected social and environmental factors, and encouraged anonymous accusations.
 These points could all, to some extent, be answered, but even the police had some criticisms:
 the programme could teach the skills of, for example, burglary, if reconstructions were too
 accurate; the offender might be helped by discovering the present state of police investigations
 into his crime ; and he might also be led to destroy evidence, or even threaten or kill witnesses,
25 in the light of that knowledge.
 It would seem that no serious undesirable consequences of Aktenzeichen XY actually came to
 pass, but no doubt criticism of Crimewatch will arise along much the same lines. And in Britain it
 will not be easy to defend the program in the German manner, as in this quotation from a
 criminologist's report on XV: 'Any member of the public may reasonably be expected to produce
30 proof of identity, to accompany a police officer to the station and to have his or her fingerprints
 taken in order to establish that he/she is not the wanted offender.' Tell that to the NCCL*.
 But it is inevitable, and in many ways desirable, that television will find itself playing an
 increasing role in combating crime. The ever-increasing mobility of criminals, and the growing
 sophistication of some of them, demand a nationwide approach, an appeal to the watching
35 millions rather than the few passing the station noticeboard. The mood of the moment favours
 public participation in 'crime-fighting' and, in many overstretched areas of policing, it is
 becoming almost essential. So the time is ripe for Crimewatch UK. Those reconstructions should
 pull in the viewers, and it will be interesting to see what will be the outcome.
 
  Nigel Andrew in The Listener, May 31, 1984

* NCCL =National Council for Civil Liberties