Background image

terug

Chatty rhetoric rules

 When Ronald Reagan turned to Jimmy Carter during the 1980 televised presidential debate
 and said: 'There you go again', he apparently struck a chord with millions of viewers - to the
 extent that this informal-sounding conversational remark was still in people's minds four years
 later.
5 However, when he used the same line during the first of this year's televised debates - the
 second is due today - he came badly unstuck. Walter Mondale had taken the trouble to study
 a video tape of the 1980 encounter, and had a reply ready in case Reagan tried it again. He also
 managed to adopt an equally conversational style, opening his counter-attack with: ' Remember
 the last time you said that?'
10 The television camera promptly switched to the president, revealing an expression of
 bewilderment on his face which suggested that, indeed, he could not. His memory had evidently
 failed him and opened the way for his age to be discussed damagingly in public.
 More generally, there's little doubt that the key to effective television communication involves
 mastering verbal and non-verbal techniques which are quite different from those politicians have
15 relied on for more than 2000 years . The traditional skills of oratory no longer enjoy a monopoly,
 and are increasingly giving way to a new style of low-key conversational rhetoric.
 The reason is th at techniques that are highly effective for reaching people on the back row of
 a large auditorium have a quite different impact when seen clos e up. Skilfully co-ordinated
 gestures, carefully crafted sentences and poetic-sounding cadences are likely to come over on
20 the small screen as unnecessarily exaggerated. One of RonaId Reagan's most significant technical
 innovations has been a conversational style of oratory finely tuned to the homely context of the
 mass television audience .
 Television programming also operates within severe time constraint, which puts politicians who
 need more than a few minutes to develop an argument at a serious disadvantage. News bulletins
25 require a continual supply of quotable quotes in which the gist of a message is conveyed in
 seconds rather than minutes. And here again, with his inimitable brand of one-liners, Reagan has
 found yet another effective way of operating.
 How, then, did such an accomplished performer go wrong in the op ening debate with Walter
 Mondale? The most likely answer is that he simply departed too far from the script, thereby
30 permitting Mondale to expose the main, and perhaps the only, weakness in Reagan's te levisua I
 technique. Being able to sound conversational is one thing, but to do so from a script is quite
 another. It is a rare skill, part of the stock-in-trade of professional broadcasters and screen actors.
 But the snag is that an ability to perform from a text as if there were no text at all provides no .-
 guarantee that a speaker will also be able to handle the open-ended uncertainties of a more,.
35 free-flowing conversational debate.
 Apart from the televised campaign confrontations, the Republicans have been remarkably
 successful in insulating their leader from unscripted encounters with political opponents. The US
 constitution, with its separation of powers between legislature and execut ive*, has insulated him
 just as effectively from the rough and tumble of debate in congress.
40 Far from demonstrating that his opponent's televisual technique is in serious dec1ine, Mondale
 may have done no more than highlight the fact that the president 's conversational repertoire is
 not (and perhaps never was) complete . Certainl y, in thi s respect, Reagan 's skilIs wer e shown to
 be limited, but one of the lessons of the past four years has been that an American president can
 survive perfectly well without such qualities.
 
 Max Atkinson in The Sunday Times. October 21, 1984


* legislature and executive = wetgevend een uitvoerende macht