Background image

terug

The Sunday Times, December 19, 1982

 Leonie Caldecott writes here about Greenham Common where women have staged
 a continuousprotest against Cruise missiles being based in Great Britain.
 
 The first time I saw Greenham Common US Air Force base, just over a year ago, in September
 1981, the 'Greenham women' were still a long way off their present notoriety. An attempt to
 attract media coverage by chaining themselves to the fence resulted only in the discovery that the
 'gentlemen' of the press found bondage more disarming than disarmament and only for a day or
5 5two at most.
 I arrived at the small encampment in the midst of drizzling rain to find a couple of women
 making tea on a fire under a makeshift shelter. Feeling slightly awkward, I sipped the proffered
 brew and asked them how long they intended to stay. 'For as long as it takes to get a genuine
 public debate on the issue of nuclear weapons in this country, and about Cruise missiles in
10 particular,' said a cheerful woman with a small child in her lap. She tumed out to be Helen John.
 Now, when I see her on television arguing in her down-to-earth manner, unperturbed by even the
 most hostile questioning, I remember that first meeting and can't help smiling at how unlikely
 this prospect seemed at the time, as in the early days, it was all too easy to imagine the camp
 fading away into the twilight of exhausted activism.
15 15 During the long hard winter months many changes occurred: practical problems and personality
 clashes took their toll. Some women left. Other, younger women tumed up. The local council
 issued an eviction order. The women asked men not to stay at the camp any longer, but only to
 visit. The first eviction was enforced, then another from the Ministry of Transport land on to
 which the women had moved. By the beginning of this winter the women had no space left on
20 which they could legally live. So they lived rough under plastic sheeting and large umbrellas. On
 top of this, there was growing pressure from the wider peace movement for the women to prove
 their effectiveness.
 In September the idea surfaced within the camp of surrounding the base completely with
 women. December 12, the day of the decision to deploy Cruise missiles, was set as the date.
25 I felt excited but a trifle sceptical. Where would they get the requisite numbers of women in
 the time left? They would need at least 12,000 to cover the nine miles and the weather might well
 be less than conducive to a mass tum out at that time of year. Greenham communications are
 erratic at the best of times and by now the funds raised from supporters were beginning to run
 out - due to legal costs and fines incurred during the spring and summer. The women were on
30 their own.
 Or rather, not on their own, as it tumed out. They began to send out chain letters which spread
 like wildfire, tuming up in the postbags of women far and wide, all over Britain and other parts
 of the world. The mythology of Greenham had begun to operate. Everywhere I went in those
 intervening months, women were talking about it.
35 The big day dawned grey and drizzly. Coaches full of women of all ages and backgrounds
 thundered down from all over the country towards Greenham. By early aftemoon there were
 enough women at the base to surround it three times . Men provided food and ran the crêche.
 My own experiences over the past 16 months have shown me that the peace issue is the straw
 that could break the back of women's political passivity. It's as though the small, pilotless Cruise
40 missile is the line over which hitherto a-political women are suddenly refusing to let the powers
 that be.
 
 The Sunday Times, December 19, 1982