Background image

terug

The Sunday Times, December 5, 1982

 The best way to leam is to teach. This is the message emerging from experiments in several
 schools in which teenage pupils who have problems at school themselves are tutoring younger
 children - with remarkable results for both sides . According to American research, pupil tutoring
 wins 'hands down' over computerized instruction and American teachers say that no other recent
5 innovation has proved so consistently successful.
 Now the idea is spreading in Britain. Throughout this term, a group of 14-year-olds at Trinity
 Comprehensive in Leamington Spa have been spending an hour a week helping children at a
 nearby primary school with their reading. The younger children read aloud to their tutors (who
 are supervised by university students of education) and then play word games with them. All the
10 14-year-olds have some of their own lessons in a special unit for children who have difficulties at
 school. Though their intelligence is around average, most of them have fallen behind on reading,
 writing and maths and, in some cases, this has led to truancy* or bad behaviour in class.
 Jean Bond, who is running the special unit, says that the main benefit of tutoring is that it
 improves the adolescents' self-esteem. 'The younger children come rushing up every time and
15 welcome them. It makes the tutors feel important whereas, in normal school lessons, they often
 feel inadequate. Everyone benefits. The older children need practice in reading but, if they had to
 do it in their own classes , they would say it was kid's stuff and be worried about losing face. The
 younger children get individual attention from very patient people: the tutors are struggling at
 school themselves, so, when the younger ones can't leam , they know exactly why.'
20 Jean Bond, who describes pupil tutoring as an 'educational conjuring trick ', has run two
 previous experiments. In one, six persistent truants, aged 15 upwards, tutored 12 slow-leaming
 infants in reading and maths. None of the six played truant from any of the tutoring sessions .
 'The degree of concentration they showed while working with their tutees was remarkable for
 pupils who had previously shown little ability to concentrate on anything related to school work
25 for any period of time,' writes Bond in the current issue of Educational Review. 'Their own
 reading, previously mechanical and monotonous, became far more expressive as a result of
 reading stories aloud to infants.'
 The tutors also became more sympathetic to their own teachers' difficulties, because they were
 frustrated themselves when the infants 'mucked about.'
30 Other experiments have also shown clear gains in children's leaming. Carol Fitz-Gibbon, a
 lecturer at Newcastle University, got low-achieving 14-year-olds in Los Angeles to teach fractions
 to nine-year-olds. After the experiment, the tutors did much better on a test than contemporaries
 who had been taught fractions in normal lessons. Even more remarkably, they maintained their
 lead on another test three months later, while the other children seemed to have forgotten
35 everything they had leamt. Fitz-Gibbon reports that several tutors were anxious to get their sums
 right to save embarrassment in front of younger children: 'In low-achieving secondary maths
 classes it is frequently quite difficult to induce any sense of needing to leam maths. References to
 later employability or exam success mean little to restless teenagers. The tutoring project
 provided tutors with an immediate need to know the work.'
40 Advocates of pupil tutoring stress that it is essential for the tutors to be more advanced in
 reading and maths than the younger pupils. This is why tutoring within the same age group, or
 across a narrow age difference, does not work.
 
 The Sunday Times, December 5, 1982


* truancy = spijbelen