Background image

terug

The Observer, June 6, 1982

 V. A prison is still a prison, however much fresh primrose paint you slap on its rock-heavy walls.
 Walking around Wormwood Scrubs, one of Britain's biggest and the one where all life sentences
 start, it's at first hard to realize, though, that the thousand or so inmates are being held in there
 by force. For the first impression is cheerful enough: men busy in workshops, prisoners trotting
5 purposefully through the long corridors on errands. Only the high wire fences, and the dogs and
 the groups of warders watching the men in their blue denim uniforms walking round and round
 the windy exercise yard remind you that this is not, in fact, a barracks or a big boarding school.
 It is the sheer ordinariness of the prison that forces so insistently the question nobody answers:
 what is it all supposed to be for? The Victorians, who built the Scrubs as if it were a model
10 fortress, had no doubts: a prison was for punishment. But that's now considered barbaric and
 ineffective.
 Is it there to reform the men? That was Elizabeth Fry's notion, to be accomplished with Bible
 readings and useful work; but in practice there's precious little of either. The Scrubs has a small
 therapeutic unit where those who opt for it get group therapy, five hours a day, remorselessly for
15 months, but even when it works, that's just for a tiny minority.
 Is it there to keep people off the streets, so they can't hurt anyone while they're inside? Not a
 bad idea - but th en, the length of time you 're inside ought to depend on how likely you are to do
 it again. So the persistent petty thief would be in for ever, and the man who had used a once-for-all
 meat cleaver on his faithless wife would walk free.
20 Perhaps the real answer is the one given by one of the saner warders: he said simply 'to ease
 the conscience of society'; by shutting these men away, people can let themselves off worrying
 about why the crimes were committed.
 Not that the prison people worry, either: the crime's the last thing they think about. This
 warder said he didn't even know the crimes of three- quarters of the men in his charge: there's
25 even a sort of prison convention that you don't mention whatever it was the man's in for. This is
 the thing that is most amazing to the outsider. After the first few days, they all agree, the only
 thing that counts for the prisoner is making things as tolerable as possible - as it is for the
 warder, only from the opposite point of view. All enlightened people concerned with prisons
 take the same line: perhaps they would find it intolerable, in their day-to-day dealings with these
30 men, if they had to think 'He's the one who bashed up that old lady'. But if the crime's not
 important, what are they doing there at all?
 The men are in prison because of a crime; yet the prison doesn't seem to relate to the crime in
 any way. It can 't punish and reform at the same time; so in practice it doesn't do either. It is
 simply a parallel society, out of which, in due course, a man will emerge: maybe better, maybe
35 worse; but probably much the same as before.
 Small wonder that concerned people more and more ask what on earth could be tried instead:
 they'll look at anything that seems to extend the range of the three standard options of fine,
 probation* or prison. More money has just been voted for those who, since the 1972 Criminal
 Justice Act, can do community service; that's something. One or two judges in Germany have
40 tried punishments that do seem relevant - making motorbike tearaways, for example, go to work
 in an accident ward; but of course half the time there isn't any such appropriate punishment
 available.
 We buy crime books in their millions, we watch crime series on TV five times a night; we're
 obsessed with the idea of those who committed a crime being caught and brought to justice. But
45 when that's all over we seem totally uninterested in what happens next. Put them away, shut
 them up, hide them; and we can forget all about them - until the next time when we can get
 indignant all over again.
 
 The Observer, June 6, 1982


* probation = voorwaardelijke veroordeling