Background image

terug

Low morale Atthe United Nations.

 There is an ancient joke at the UN that goes : Question - How many people work in the UN
 Secretariat? Answer - About half. In reality , high UN officials say, the number is much less. One
 senior official told a reporter recently that about a quarter of the headquarters staff of 5,000
 performs conscientiously; the rest are 'passively resistant'. For that reason UN delegates, as well
5 as administration officials, find it hard to sympathize with a series of demonstrations that are now
 being staged by the union that represents the Secretariat staff. Few delegates paid attention when
 1,000 staff members marched around the building carrying placards demanding changes in the
 UN's recruitment, promotion, and compensation policies.
 Nonetheless, the men and women who work in the sleek, glass skyscraper on the East River
10 have many legitimate grievances. Their jobs are frustrating and their prospects depressing.
 Although the UN is dedicated to promoting justice, human rights, and social progress, it treats its
 own employees with little regard for those principles.
 UN regulations which are decreed by the General Assembly, require the Secretary-General to
 recruit the staff on the basis of 'equitable geographical distribution.' To that end, each of the 7
15 member nations has been allocated a quota of staff positions. In practice, that means UN jobs go
 not to the best qualified applicants but to those who come from countries with unfilled quotas.
 And a number of those countries use the UN as a dumping ground for officials they don't want
 at home. 'So much for the concept of an international civil service based on merit,' a staff
 member said bitterly.
20 Competence and hard work do not ensure promotion because many of the better jobs are
 regarded as the exclusive preserve of certain countries. Mr Andreas Kahnert, a union official,
 told reporters last week about a high-ranking statistician in the energy department of the
 Secretariat who had to ask his colleagues what solid fuel was. 'It's no joke,' Mr Kahnert said. 'He
 was hired because he comes from country X and that country's nationals have always held that
25 job.' In theory, the UN could fire incompetent employees, but that might offend governments.
 Apart from not being qualified, many employees who were hired because of political
 considerations do not share the idealism that used to be the hall mark of UN civil servants. 'We
 came here because we believed in internationalism,' said one of the more dedicated staff
 members. 'Now more and more people are coming because they want a few years of the good
30 life in New York. It's terribly frustrating to work with these people.'
 The UN, for all its talk of equality among nations, has instituted a rigid caste system for its
 own employees. Secretaries, clerks and manual workers come under the category of 'general
 services' and their salaries range from $12,000 to $30,000 a year. Translators, editors, economists,
 and so forth fall into the 'professional' category. Their salaries range from $75,000 and they get
35 many benefits not available to general service employees.
 Moreover, general service jobs are dead ends. Regardless of their qualifications, secretaries
 and clerks are seldom promoted to the professional level, again because most of the professional
 jobs are handed out according to 'equitable geographical distribution'. For years the staff uni on
 has been pressing the UN to institute a career development system, but the administration has
40 dragged its feet, obviously for fear of antagonizing member nations.
 Vet it is the clerical and secretarial employees who keep the UN going, according to Mr
 Lowell Flanders, former president of the staff union. 'They often carry the ball for some of these
 dunderhead political appointees who don't know which end is up, and they realize they're
 carrying the ball and not getting any credit, so it makes morale pretty low.'
 
 The Guardian, November 28, 1982