No one knows how children learn to read: how they master the mammoth code-breaking task | ||
of matching spoken language to a series of small black marks on a page. | ||
Until now, teaching children to read has been a very hit and miss affair. More than any other | ||
area of the school curriculum, reading has attracted a mass of schemes and gimmicks designed to | ||
5 | get children painlessly over the hurdles which bar their way to school learning and professional | |
success. Like freely available medicines, some of the goods are sounder than others; they work for | ||
some children and teachers, earning their promoters a fortune, while others sink without trace. | ||
Each new broadening of education, from the arrival of printing and of Bibles in the mother | ||
tongue in the 15th century to the introduction of universal, compulsory education in the 19th, has | ||
10 | boosted the market. | |
Some children scarcely seem to need all these paraphernalia, learning to read almost | ||
imperceptibly. Others defy for years all the efforts of teachers armed with reading schemes and | ||
flashcards, plastic letters and coloured bricks. Most manage to crack the basic code by about | ||
seven or eight, but too many, perhaps as many as 20 per cent, fall at the next hurdle: the ability to | ||
15 | use their skill as a means of gaining knowledge and enjoyment. In the last year new light has been | |
shed on this old mystery. Like pieces of a jigsaw, research studies set up several years ago because | ||
of national anxiety at levels of illiteracy - have been brought together to yield a picture | ||
that has revolutionary implications both for parents and primary school teachers. | ||
Extending Beginning Reading by Vera Southgate, Helen Arnold and Sandra Johnson confounds | ||
20 | many dearly-held beliefs. In particular, the authors found that teachers who try to hear all | |
children read aloud frequently, hinder their progress. Children learn best if left in peace to read | ||
the books they choose for themselves. Learning to read is so highly personal a business, it | ||
depends so much on groundwork before the age of five and the opportunity to practise at home | ||
and in private, that much of the work must be done by parents. | ||
25 | Such a message, while it may seem a welcome dawn of common sense to many parents, is | |
deeply threatening to many teachers. They are being asked to change from pedagogues to | ||
managers and counselors, advising parents and children, diagnosing weaknesses, sorting out | ||
appropriate remedies, organizing teaching materials, stimulating and encouraging. | ||
It is when this study is set alongside another carried out under the guidance of the late Professor | ||
30 | Jack Tizard in Haringey that the full nature of the revolution becomes apparent. Still not published | |
in full, the Haringey study of children aged between six and nine showed that they made most | ||
progress in reading when their parents heard them read at home at least three or four times a | ||
week. The effects were dramatically better than if parents simply read to their children or played | ||
with and talked to them. By contrast, providing extra reading help in school with a specialist | ||
35 | teacher four afternoons a week was found to be almost totally ineffective. | |
There is, of course, nothing new about parents helping children at home. What is new is the | ||
official blessing for such activities. The Bullock report (1975) specifically warned against parents | ||
giving formal help at home. The education world is beginning to realize that parents must be | ||
taken into partnership in a much more thorough way than anything envisaged by the average | ||
40 | parent/teacher association. The days are over when teachers could say to parents, 'you teach them | |
to tie their laces and go to the toilet on their own and we will do the rest.' | ||
The Observer Magazine, September 13, 1981 |