Background image

terug

Gill Walton in The Observer, June 24, 1979

 As a dog-hater in a nation of dog-lovers, I have always done my utmost to avoid any confrontation
 with other people's pets; not venturing into the street while stray four-footers are passing by and, once
 outside, making elaborate detours if an animal appears on the horizon. I always make my fears known
 to a new acquaintance as soon as possible so that, should she have a pet, I can eliminate the risk of
5 being enthusiastically set upon as soon as I knock at her door.
 Yet I am invariably met with the most profound lack of understanding. 'It's all right, he won't
 hurt you' is the most common rejoinder to my reasonable request that the family pet be shut in the
 kitchen while I visit. However, my dislike of dogs is not based solely on the possibility of being
 bitten - I also find them repulsive. Visits to pet-owning families are, I hasten to add, only made by
10 me under considerable persuasion, as I have come to anticipate the outcome.
 Having previously extracted a promise from new acquaintance to shut pet up during my visit, I
 nervously knock at the front-door. This disturbance immediately sets off a ferocious barking just
 behind the letter box, which is followed by a howl of dismay as pet is unceremoniously thrust into
 the kitchen. I enter and all goes well for ten minutes or so, when the piteous whimpering from the
15 1rear of the house begins to tug on the heart strings of my hostess, who murmurs: 'Poor thing, he's
 not used to being shut up', and casts a reproachful look in my direction.
 The next stage is for the animal to succeed in opening the door of its prison, after unceasing
 labours to that end, and spring joyfully into the lounge. If I'm lucky, pet-owner will recover sufficiently
 quickly from her surprise at my terrified yell of 'Hold him! Hold him!' to arrest the animal's
20 flight in my direction, and thus save me from being licked to death. More often, though, it's a case of
 my making a humiliating retreat up the hall towards the front door, followed by a soft-hearted
 pet-owner, who can't understand the necessity of shutting up poor Fido any longer.
 Perhaps the attitude of most pet-owners is an extension of 'love me, love my dog': if you offend
 my dog you also offend me. That which was not intended as an insult becomes one to these sensitive
25 people. Well, I too am sensitive, to the extent that I will not visit where I know the hostess to be more
 sympathetic to the feelings of her pet than to mine. I do not expect preferential treatment, merely
 equal consideration. The dog is considered to be a member of the family and, as such, has free run of
 the house, but my visit is not going to restrict the animal's freedom permanently.
 In spite of my feelings, I can see that animals are amusing in their behaviour, especially when
30 portrayed on television or in films, and I see that their owners really do love them, perhaps as one
 would love a child. So why is it that I, who do not consider myself especially gifted with the power
 of entering into other people's feelings, can appreciate this relationship without actually having
 experienced it, while so many dog-owners, who claim to have an affinity with their pets, cannot accord
 to a fellow human-being a mutual understanding?
 
 Gill Walton in The Observer, June 24, 1979