Background image

terug

People will always judge by appearances

People will always judge by appearances

LOVING parents,   

Minette Marrin

   peculiar is often harsh.   to her eyes, or pin back
if they canOther children can be sur-her ears, but anyone
afford it, buyprisingly cruel. My littlelooking at her must be
their daughterssister’s birthday parties,[id:9220] her new pretti-
pretty clothes and get[id:9219], were full of tinyness, and her confidence,
their teeth fixed. Theygirls in pretty partywhile still unmistakably a
take them to doctors fordresses, who before longDown’s person. If there is
acne and to surgeons forwould start taunting myone thing I have become
birthmarks or squints, andsister for her oddities, andconvinced of, it is that it
for cleft palates, club feetend up leaving her inis essential to think prag-
or curved spines. If a boytears. If there had beenmatically, and always
messes up his face in aany kind of scientificabout the [id:9221]. Phi-
motorcycle accident,magic to change all that,losophical principles
parents try to arrangeor even to make it onlyabout the meaning of han-
cosmetic surgery. TheThere seems to be aslightly better, of course Idicap in general are irre-
[id:9215] of such repairs towidely held view thatwould have been inlevant to the question of
a child’s well-being isthere is something wrongfavour of it.what was best for this
often very obvious. Andwith [id:9217] the disabili-

After the
surgery she is
pretty, but still
unmistakably a
Down's person


little girl. Her photographs
loving parents who are soty that is Down’s syn-show that her appearance
protective of one of theirdrome. At its extreme thisis now enormously
children would not be anyview holds that it is de-more attractive
less protective of another.meaning to people withand acceptable.
My sister and I bothDown’s to suggest thatA young Down’s syn-
damaged our front teeththeir condition is in itselfdrome man said on the
in minor accidents whenundesirable. To suggestsame documentary last
we were children. Itthat it should be eradi-week: “I wish people
would have been unthink-cated, or at least modi-wouldn’t judge by ap-
able in our family that myfied, is to devalue them aspearances.” But they do
teeth should have beenindividuals. Therefore itIn the case of theand they always will, for
capped but not hers, justis [id:9218]. Society, notthree-year-old girl, theredeep-seated reasons, and
because she was [id:9216]the individual, shouldis surgery that can subtlynot always bad ones.
and I was supposedlychange.alter her appearance, re-[id:9222] appearances work
normal. Yet this ideaI sympathise with thislieve some physical diffi-both ways. The ap-
seems to lie behind thefeeling, but it is undisci-culties and make her lookpearance of Down’s is, to
arguments last week,plined sentimentality. Theless odd. Her oversizedanyone capable of kind-
widely reported in thetruth is, however muchtongue has been reduced.ness, a sign to be gentle:
media, about a three-we may love anShe will now find eatingstigmata have their
year-old girl with Down’sindividual sufferer, thatand speaking easier. Hergentler uses. Curiously
syndrome, whose parentsDown’s syndrome ismalformed teeth and biteenough, one of my
had arranged cosmeticundesirable. So is spinacan be made to looksister’s problems was that
surgery for her, andbifida or Huntington’sbetter and to work better.her quite normal ap-
whose case was the sub-chorea. Which of usWho could deny such im-pearance worked against
ject of a television docu-would not wave a wand,provements to any child?her: there weren’t any
mentary. Many peopleif we could, and magic itI don’t think it was sodisarming signs in her ap-
expressed shock and dis-away? For one thing theobviously desirable topearance.
approval.life of a child who ismake subtle adjustments
   'The Sunday Telegraph'