Background image

terug

A chimp’s life revisited

adapted from an article by Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times Film Critic

\
1    In late November 1973, a young woman
 from New York went to Oklahoma to adopt
 the newest and youngest member of her
 family. It wasn’t a human baby she was
 bringing home to Manhattan, however, but
 rather a 2-week-old chimpanzee, destined
 to be part of an audacious project to see if
 a member of another species could be
 taught to communicate with humans. The
 unforeseen ways that notion played out
 over the next two dozen years is the subject of James Marsh’s unsettling “Project
 Nim”. What happened between that chimp and the humans with whom he spent
 his life in intimate contact turns out to be only half the story that Marsh has to tell.
2    Marsh is a superb interviewer, and the key participants in Nim’s story are far
 enough removed in time to be candid about what happened but not so far away
 to have forgotten the details. 17 he has a weakness for occasional
 unsatisfactory dramatizations, Marsh also makes excellent use of the large
 amount of still and movie footage shot then that shows us exactly what Nim and
 his human hosts were up to.
3    It was Columbia University behavioral psychologist Herbert Terrace who
 came up with the idea of placing a chimp in a human family to see if it could be
 taught American Sign Language. Stephanie LaFarge, one of Terrace’s former
 graduate students, was Nim’s original surrogate mother. She had recently
 remarried, and her blended family of seven children lived in an apartment in New
 York that became Nim’s new home. If you’re thinking this was a group decision,
 you would be wrong. “There was no discussion, it just happened,” remembers
 Jenny Lee, LaFarge’s daughter. And her mother, who admits she “liked the
 freedom to defy expectations and authority,” makes no bones about the fact that
 “my appetite and drive to have an intimate relationship with an animal was
 unstoppable.”
4    Not surprisingly, this drive ran into some real-world problems. For one thing,
 LaFarge was not prepared for what she calls “the wild animal in Nim,” and
 LaFarge’s husband didn’t expect the outright hostility from a chimp genetically
 inclined to 19 male authority figures.
5    All of this was intensified by growing conflicts between Terrace, who
 consistently comes off as cold and arrogant, and Earth mother-type LaFarge,
 who’d once been his lover. Unhappy with what he considered a lack of order,
 Terrace gave increasing organizational authority to a bright, highly motivated
 (and, not surprisingly, quite attractive) 18-year-old student named Laura-Ann
 Petitto. The philosophical differences between her and LaFarge were so intense
 that the distaste each one feels for the other is undiminished to this day.
6    While even these few events are emotional enough to bring a scientific drama
 to a boil, more was in store for Nim, much more. There was significant turnover in
 caregivers, multiple changes of location, even radical alterations in Terrace’s
 thinking about whether chimps could in fact be taught to learn language in any
 meaningful way. Trapped in a world he never made, a no-man’s land between
 species, Nim did the best he could, and even doing that much turned out to be
 difficult.
 Looking back on Nim now, LaFarge feels “we had done so much damage
 removing him from what his life should have been, it was wrong.” Speaking even
 more strongly is Joyce Butler, one of his signing teachers. “We did a huge
 disservice to him and his soul, and shame on us,” she says, just about in tears,
 and seeing this eye-opening film makes it impossible to argue the point. No
 wonder it won the best directing award for world documentary at Sundance.
   Los Angeles Times, 2011