Background image

terug

Drug cheats make everybody a loser

Drug cheats make everybody a loser


11    Where is the achievement in becoming the greatest athlete in the world if nobody
2 believes you? Yet there are still those willing to pursue Olympic glory through drugs,
3 risking the shame and humiliation of discovery, and the unknown long-term side-effects, in
4 return for the possibility of a moment spent in the global spotlight.
25    If they get away with it (some have, and more will), theirs can be a secure future:
6 commercial contracts, fat appearance fees, a place in history. But what else? A guilty
7 secret, and a gold medal won with all the praiseworthy efforts of someone who has talked
8 an old lady out of her life savings.
39    But when exactly should we cheer the Olympic champions, and when should we
10 throw rotten vegetables? H's impossible to know. After all it doesn't show on the druggies'
11 skin.
412    And is the individual who decides to buy steroids in his local gym any more or less
13 to blame than the state-sponsored, drug-nurtured athlete who has been under close
14 supervision from childhood? The pulling down of the Berlin wall has shown us that most
15 of the rumours concerning east European drug practices were true. Last month a BBC
16 Horizon programme revealed the records of the former East Germany's state-run doping
17 plan, set up to achieve international sporting success.
518    At least the recent introduction of random testing seems to be helping sport turn the
19 corner. Several former East Germans, including Katrin Krabbe, the double world sprint
20 champion, were banned earlier this year for trying to manipulate random tests which had
21 been ordered by the German federation while they were training in South Africa. All of
22 them produced negative urine samples which were identified as having come from the
23 same person.
624    The situation is not quite as depressing as it was after the Seoul Olympics of 1988.
25 Then, it seemed, the chemists had taken over. Not only had the disqualification of Ben
26 Johnson, after his world record 100m victory, underlined the urgency of the drug problem,
27 but there were other suspicious performances in the Seoul arena which will not be
28 bettered, or probably not until the 21st century.
729    In the history of the Olympics, for instance, Florence Griffith-Joyner ('Flo-Jo') ought
30 to be ranked among the greats, having overwhelmingly won the 100m and 200m in 1988.
31 Her performances were unbelievable. And I mean unbelievable: she even set two world
32 records for the 200m in one day. But, as I wrote at the time: 'Female sprinters have been
33 running 200m long enough to know that such a huge leap from 21.71sec to 21.34sec is
34 astonishing. '
835    Now that I am able to look back, my feelings have only been strengthened. In Seoul
36 Flo-Jo ran 21.34sec smiling. It was easy. Nobody else since then has run under 21.64sec.
37 This year, going into the Games, nobody has broken 22 seconds. Certainly not Flo-Jo.
38 Early in 1989, after many awards for the Olympic achievements, and pursuing the
39 profitable writing and fashion-designing careers which resulted, she announced that her
40 goal for that summer was to break the world 400m record. Then, shortly afterwards, she
41 suddenly and inexplicably announced her retirement instead. She was probably too busy far
42 too busy to take to court those people, including Carl Lewis, who publicly stated she
43 had used drugs to achieve her astonishing results.
944    Morally, those who stand, drug-aided, with a gold medal round their necks, are
45 losers. But, as sadly for the long tradition of the Games as for the individuals involved,
46 they have also created a new species of undeserving super-loser: the man or woman who
47 actually wins through their own skill and sweat, their own determination and dedication.

from an article by Cliff Temple in the 'Sunday Times', July 26, 1992