Background image

terug

Better safe than sorry

Better safe than sorry

11    The saddening conclusion of last week's report on street violence - that nine out of
2 ten women are frightened or cautious about going out alone after dark - probably came
3 as no surprise to many women. Two-thirds of them have already allowed this
4 overwhelming fear to restriet their lifestyles : the y only go out alone after dark if
5 absolutely necessary. Something has to be done if women are not to become prisoners in
6 their homes after dark, too afraid ever to attend a meeting, have a drink with colleagues
7 after work or even go to the cinema.
28    Some argue that it is the responsibility of the authorities - local government and
9 the police - to change the environment and proteet women again st this menace. Some
10 improvements are taking place. Local authorities such as Wand sworth have improved
11 street lighting and re-designed housing estates to eliminate blind spots and pools of
12 darkness. But progress is inevitably slow.
313    In the meantime, women have to proteet themselves as best they can. A commonly
14 suggested solution is training women in self-defence. Most people's image of self-defence
15 is a series of physical techniques such as kicks to injure the attacker and break-away
16 moves to escape him. A slightly chilling example of th is approach was seen in the BBC's
17 World in Action in the person of Stan Grogan, a policeman who has trained a network of
18 instructors. Grogan was seen handling a horrible collection of weapons (to show the
19 women what they would be up against) and instructed them in judo 'throws'.
420    This approach is firmly rejected by many experts in, personal safety for women.
21 Inspeetor Sue Best of the Metropolitan Police Crime Prevention Unit recommends th at
22 physical self-defence should be an 'absolute last resort'. It should be used only when a
23 serious attack is actually happening and there is no alternative. Diana Lamplugh, who set
24 up a special trust to promote women's awareness and self-protection, says that to rely
25 completelyon self-defence can be dangerous: 'It can create a false sense of security
26 which may collapse in the event of a violent attack and leave the victim otherwise
27 unprepared.'
528    Sensible instructors in personal safety regard self-defence as just one element of
29 protection. aften it is safer and wiser to run away from the danger, talk your assailant
30 out of his attack, use a personal alarm to frighten him off or scream to draw other
31 people's attention. Lynne Howells, who organises courses in Birmingham to help women
32 deal with aggression, says : 'I would only recommend classes which start from the basis of
33 increasing women's confidence. Otherwise, we can be taught physical techniques until the
34 cows come home and we won't use them.'
635    Confidence is vital in two ways. First, there is evidence that you are more likely to
36 be attacked if you look heipiess and unaware of your surroundings. Walking with your
37 head held high, in a swinging way and an obvious awareness of your surroundings
38 frightens off possible attackers. Of course, this 'attitude' cannot be failsafe. Secondly,
39 training in confidence and alertness can also help if you are attacked. Many women
40 simply freeze and cannot do anything or even make a noise if they are attacked. But
41 special techniques help you to relax in a crisis so th at you are able to use both your voice
42 and your brain to their best effect.
743    Training in self-protection is not only designed for the most deadly of assaults.
44 Many women are daily humiliated by 'lesser' offences such as being pinched by men,
45 whistled at and followed home. Part of the 'confidence' lesson is to encourage women to
46 do something about these incidents before they go too far.


Dorothy Wade in 'The Sunday Times', January 15,1989